Unprofane vs TokLab
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Profanity filtering your users can't get around | One API key for AI image, video, language and audio models |
| Stage | Startup | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | IL | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Not given |
| Pricing | Hobby: $9/month (25,000 checks); Starter: $29/month (100,000 checks); Growth: $249/month (1,000,000 checks); Scale: $999/month (5,000,000 checks). Extra checks available at $29 per 100,000 (Hobby/Starter), $25 per 100,000 (Growth), $20 per 100,000 (Scale). Launch offer: half price on Hobby and Start | Pay-per-request pricing with no subscription. Top up USD balance starting at $15 minimum. Image models from $0.00425 per image (GPT Image 2) to $0.08 per job (Midjourney). Video models from $0.02 per second (SD Video) to $0.1425 per second (Kling 4.0). Language models from $0.01 per 1M tokens (GPT-6 |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 5 −1 (down) since last check | 8 +4 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 5 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 4 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 14 | 1 |
4 details filled in for both companies.