SuperTokens vs Toden
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Open source user authentication platform for building secure login and session management | Trust infrastructure for digital businesses. Verify people and businesses, detect fraud, make risk decisions and monitor activity through one API. |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing | Self-hosted: Free for open source features with no limits. Cloud: $0.02 per MAU (free under 5K monthly active users). Add-ons: Multi-factor Authentication $0.01/MAU (minimum $100/month), Account Linking $0.005/MAU (minimum $100/month), Dashboard users $20/user/month (first 3 free). | Free sandbox for testing. Pay as you go in production: $0.25 per identity check (includes document, liveness, face match and device checks), $0.30 per AML screen, $0.20 per wallet screen, $1.43 per business lookup, $0.02 per transaction for fraud monitoring. No monthly fees, no minimum, no contracts |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 69 +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 4 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 40 | 18 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1082 | 4 |
4 details filled in for both companies.