statusloop vs PafCore
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | statusloop | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Know before your users do. | Find what is slowing your website down to the file, then prove the fix worked |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | DE | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | Free plan (€0/month) includes 10 monitors, 1 healthcheck, 1 server, 1 status page with 5 min check interval and 30 days data retention. Essentials (€20/month or €240/year) includes 40 monitors, 10 healthchecks, 3 servers with 1 min check interval and 90 days retention. Pro (€62/month or €744/year) i | Free: score, slow file, and a few problems; three checks daily. $5 for 20 credits (lab checks, verify fixes, file lookup, image download, code to paste). Pro Watch $19/mo includes 20 pages monitored, alerts, certificate warnings, 60 monthly credits. Agency $12 per site/month for up to 25 sites. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 2 −1 (down) since last check | 26 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 6 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 28 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 2 | 19 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to statusloop More alternatives to PafCore