Close vs Clay
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Close | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | The CRM that does the work | Infrastructure to get any data, run agentic workflows, and launch GTM plays. |
| Stage | Established | Growing |
| Founded | 2013 | Not given |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Pricing | Four subscription plans: Solo ($9/user/month), Essentials ($35/user/month), Growth ($99/user/month), and Scale ($139/user/month) when billed annually. All include Chloe AI access and monthly AI credits. Call and SMS usage charged separately. | Free plan with 500 actions/month; Launch plan starting at $167/month with 15,000 actions/month; Growth plan starting at $446/month with 40,000 actions/month; Enterprise plan available on custom pricing. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 81 no change since last check | 80 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 42 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 55 | 59 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8015 | 8606 |
6 details filled in for both companies.