Skip to content
Sign in Submit a tool

SecureIntent vs Seal Security

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

SecureIntent compared with Seal Security
DetailSecureIntent logo SecureIntentSeal Security logo Seal Security
What it doesBrowser protection that stops credentials from reaching AI The fix layer for the AI era
StageStartup Not given
FoundedNot given 2023
Based inGB US
Pricing modelFreemium Free trial
PricingFree: $0/forever with browser extension, on-device credential detection, pattern and entropy checks, review before paste, and 10 anonymisations per month. Developer Pro: $8/month including unlimited dehydrate & rehydrate, Ghost Log Sanitiser, Cloud Console Session Lock. Business Pro: $9/seat/month ( Free beta tier available. Paid plans include Starter, Business, and Scale tiers with pricing based on scope of coverage, supported ecosystems, deployment requirements, and support level. Starter tier for proof-of-value pilots, Business for ongoing remediation, Scale for unlimited enterprise coverage
Key features
  • On-device detection
  • Credential anonymisation
  • Pattern and entropy checks
  • Local session restore
  • Chrome and Firefox support
  • Ghost Log Sanitiser
  • Cloud Console Session Lock
  • Shared team detection policies
  • Custom detection patterns
  • Security-team alerts
  • Verified, backported patches for existing versions without upgrades
  • Pre-CVE vulnerability fixing before public disclosure
  • Container and Linux base image remediation
  • AI coding agent integration via MCP server
  • Integration with major vulnerability scanners
  • Support for 8+ programming languages including Java, Python, JavaScript, C/C++, Go, PHP, C#, and Ruby
  • 24/7 customer support with direct Slack/Teams channels
What makes it different
  • Detects before paste, not after
  • Zero-retention architecture
  • Local on-device processing
  • Preserves workflow without blocking
  • Extends to desktop and agents
  • Fixes vulnerabilities before CVEs are published and before vendors release fixed versions
  • Human-reviewed and verified patches, not AI-generated code
  • Minimal code changes averaging just 6.5 lines per patch
  • No forced upgrades, migrations, or breaking changes to applications
  • Patches for unfixable vulnerabilities in end-of-life systems
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)3 no change since last check50 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)413
Citation Flow (Majestic)2235
Referring domains (Majestic)32203

6 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to SecureIntent More alternatives to Seal Security

Help centre