RunAPI vs x402serps
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | One API key for every AI model with unified billing and schema-first integration | Pay-per-call web search API for AI agents |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | GB |
| Pricing model | Not given | Freemium |
| Pricing | Pay-as-you-go token-based billing. Video models from $0.0096/second to $2.52/video. LLM models from $0.05/1M input tokens. Audio and image models vary by capability. No subscriptions, no minimums, credits never expire. Failed generations not charged. | Web search: $0.004/10 results; News search: $0.004/10 results; URL extract: $0.003/URL; Search + extract: $0.02; Deep research: $0.08; AI visibility check: $0.10; Competitor report: $0.30; Lead finder: $0.25; SEO audit: $0.20; News digest: $0.05; Cited answer: $0.02; Crawl site: $0.002/page; Map sit |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 −1 (down) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 7 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 37 | 27 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 125 | 11 |
4 details filled in for both companies.