Phishnoo vs depproof
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI-powered social engineering simulations and security awareness training that turns employees into your strongest cyber defense | Self-hosted application security and software composition analysis for open-source dependencies |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | NL | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Pricing starts at €80/month (or £75/month or $85/month). Plans include phishing simulations, awareness training, Phishnoo Radar threat intelligence, AI Exposure Testing, one-click threat reporting, progress tracking, and AI-enhanced automated simulations. | Scanner: Free for open source and organizations under $1M revenue; includes every repository, full transitive resolution for Java, JavaScript, Python, Go, license audit, OSV advisories with CI gate, HTML report and CycloneDX SBOM. Over $1M revenue, the Scanner license adds priority support and polic |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 19 +1 (up) since last check | 14 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 14 | 5 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 24 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 12 | 24 |
5 details filled in for both companies.