Skip to content
Sign in Submit a tool

Epherem vs Seal Security

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Epherem compared with Seal Security
DetailEpherem logo EpheremSeal Security logo Seal Security
What it doesFree security scanning for apps built with AI The fix layer for the AI era
StageMVP Not given
FoundedNot given 2023
Based inSG US
Pricing modelFree Free trial
PricingFree during early access, 5 scans a day Free beta tier available. Paid plans include Starter, Business, and Scale tiers with pricing based on scope of coverage, supported ecosystems, deployment requirements, and support level. Starter tier for proof-of-value pilots, Business for ongoing remediation, Scale for unlimited enterprise coverage
Key features
  • 55 security checks for common AI-built app mistakes
  • Package dependency vulnerability checking
  • GitHub integration and ZIP upload
  • AI tool fix prompts for Cursor and Claude Code
  • File and line number location for each finding
  • Plain language security explanations
  • Report persistence and code deletion
  • Coverage for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python
  • Verified, backported patches for existing versions without upgrades
  • Pre-CVE vulnerability fixing before public disclosure
  • Container and Linux base image remediation
  • AI coding agent integration via MCP server
  • Integration with major vulnerability scanners
  • Support for 8+ programming languages including Java, Python, JavaScript, C/C++, Go, PHP, C#, and Ruby
  • 24/7 customer support with direct Slack/Teams channels
What makes it different
  • Deterministic checks that give the same results every time, not variable AI answers
  • No AI reads your code during scanning
  • Reports designed for people who built the app, not security engineers
  • Free with nothing hidden during early access
  • Transparent about scan limitations in every report
  • Fixes vulnerabilities before CVEs are published and before vendors release fixed versions
  • Human-reviewed and verified patches, not AI-generated code
  • Minimal code changes averaging just 6.5 lines per patch
  • No forced upgrades, migrations, or breaking changes to applications
  • Patches for unfixable vulnerabilities in end-of-life systems
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last check50 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)613
Citation Flow (Majestic)2535
Referring domains (Majestic)16203

6 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Epherem More alternatives to Seal Security

Help centre