Skip to content
Sign in Submit a tool

Epherem vs Casco

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Epherem compared with Casco
DetailEpherem logo EpheremCasco logo Casco
What it doesFree security scanning for apps built with AI Autonomous security platform for vulnerability investigation and agent workflows
StageMVP Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inSG US
Pricing modelFree Contact for pricing
PricingFree during early access, 5 scans a day Not given
Key features
  • 55 security checks for common AI-built app mistakes
  • Package dependency vulnerability checking
  • GitHub integration and ZIP upload
  • AI tool fix prompts for Cursor and Claude Code
  • File and line number location for each finding
  • Plain language security explanations
  • Report persistence and code deletion
  • Coverage for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python
  • Public CVE API with RSS and JSON feeds
  • Dependency vulnerability checking for multiple package managers
What makes it different
  • Deterministic checks that give the same results every time, not variable AI answers
  • No AI reads your code during scanning
  • Reports designed for people who built the app, not security engineers
  • Free with nothing hidden during early access
  • Transparent about scan limitations in every report
  • Evidence-backed findings with reproducible, inspectable work
  • Autonomous investigation reduces noise and focuses on actionable results
  • Learns from false positives to prevent them recurring
  • Integrates directly into agent workflows and existing tools
  • Public CVE data API with no authentication required
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)2 +1 (up) since last check42 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)614
Citation Flow (Majestic)2537
Referring domains (Majestic)16250

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Epherem More alternatives to Casco

Help centre