Altseat vs plagio
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Run multiple Claude Code, Codex and Kimi Code accounts on one Mac with automatic usage tracking and handoff | An MCP server and REST API for coding agents to capture and rebuild web pages |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free trial |
| Pricing | Free for up to 2 accounts total across all three tools. Lifetime license USD 12 one-time (launch price through 30 November 2026, then USD 19), allowing up to 10 accounts per tool on one Mac. One payment, no subscription. | Free trial: 7 days with 500 credits (card required). Paid plan: €9.99 per month, billed €29.97 every 3 months with 5,000 credits a month. A capture uses 10 credits, a cached capture uses 5 credits. Top-ups available from €10 with no expiration. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | 13 −2 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 13 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 2 |
5 details filled in for both companies.